Catia Manifesto
Introduction.
In Central Council meeting Social Movement Alternative and Community Media (MoMac) in the populous, diverse and combative Catia community, parish Sucre, Caracas, Saturday, October 16, 2010, under the starting year of the bicentenary cycle that marks the independence struggle that made possible the liberation of the homeland from the yoke of English imperialism and served at the same time, an example and stimulus for the release of the sister nuestroamericanos, and in the midst of the current struggle that has raised the brave Bolivarian people by the final consolidation of the independence of all kinds of imperialist intervention and the realization of the dream of our founding fathers Bolivarian reflected in the expression to achieve "... the greatest sum of happiness possible" and in response also to us as men and women workers (as) inseparable from the popular media, on the one hand, with the complaint and confrontation of the imperialist hegemonic message - neoliberal and on the other, generating a new model of social change communication facilitator; of citizens (as) aware of the need to establish new and higher social relations, and revolutionaries (as) committed (as) with the revolutionary struggle vindicating of all the aspirations and hopes of our people, was approved this document in synthetic terms, reflects the approach we hold the present political situation and the relationship between State and Communication and the name of Manifest Catia make known to the public as a necessary and indispensable contribution to the debate between the revolutionary (as) Venezuela (as).
As 26S elections and their results.
note that: 1. regarding the composition of the new National Assembly, the Bolivarian forces won a comfortable majority (98/67) that will maintain a decisive influence in the national parliament, an institution designed to serve a very important role in the political dynamics of the future, even where not achieved the desired qualified majority required for making decisions on certain matters of institutional importance and, for its part, the opposition forces had recovered a lost space in the previous elections when, by his calculations destabilizing coup and took the stupid decision to abstain 2. in relation to the sum of the votes, although it is rude to extrapolate to regard it as a projection defining the future political scenario, whether it is useful as an indicator to approximate the existing balance of power (just over five million votes for each force polarized). And it is reflected stagnant revolutionary option for wear government action, as opposed to a relative growth of the forces propelling the former conservative or status quo, denoting by masonry, the penetration of regressive ideas in certain areas of the popular sectors. Here are the results as compelling reading becomes critical for contextual analysis: in any case, it looks appropriate to determine the possible causes that affect the stagnation of the transforming forces.
In our view this should be the main concern of the Venezuelan revolutionaries, at the present time, but shall not be conceptualized as imminent danger to the process of change which is playing in the Venezuelan social reality (among other things because in this election was not raised competition commander candidatural Chavez fundamental political factor motivational collective sense in the first half of XXI century Venezuelan). Servants
cuartorrepublicano
Undoubtedly, a number of factors combine to produce these results, among others, we appreciate the impact on the popular electorate of poor management of mayors and governors - with the natural exceptions - in different regions of the country that been generating a growing unease and disappointment evident in a town hungry for solutions to their problems and realizing their dreams, with the aggravating circumstance of the absence of a party capable capable of exercising critical function necessary comptroller. In this vote punishment and / or indifference abstention, it is felt the wicked and indolent bureaucracy fueled by the fifth column, all levels of government, makes decisions, monitoring of effective executory provisions and guidelines involving to welcome the millions of concurrent users to public offices.
In this consideration it is true we miss the fact that the vast majority of technical staff on which rest the functioning of the Venezuelan state apparatus were formed during the fourth republic prevail, yet, in them the values \u200b\u200bof capitalist society , rentier, consumerist and dependent precisely is to be transformed. It is in this civil service that has been the rule, with its many flaws and virtues rare, so it will go while building a new hegemony and training, therefore, the new city, including new staff, with the values \u200b\u200binherent in society of the future.
This confrontation can not be but an expression of intense and necessary class struggle is the ideological core of its edges.
The revolution is made against the State
In this vein, too, it should be mentioned the incongruity theory - conceptual show government officials, senior and middle leaders of the party (PSUV) in the sense of taking the state as the decisive instrument for the construction of socialism, according to this approach is not the revolution against the state, but with and from the state, placing a neutral entity and served for the construction of bourgeois society can serve, given its neutrality, to build a socialist society, gross ignorance has cost both to other people who have experienced the same error.
From our point of view, this conceptual failure in practical terms translates into the effort that put officials on strengthening their "areas of power" or promote a course tutored people power from and by the State at the expense of genuine development of popular power, strengthening of social movements, blocking, therefore the organization of people, historical subject of the Bolivarian revolution. Do not understand that the State, rather, we must weaken progressively strengthened, in contrast, people's organization through the municipalities, community councils, councils of workers, peasants and students and so many other expressions of popular organization, in this The National Assembly now dies, fulfilled an important task to give legal content to an entire social reality that has been manifest in this decade of the Bolivarian process, even if, in our opinion, committed significant shortcomings such as non-approval of the Labor Law.
In this historic period of transition, the State inherited subjected to continuous processing dynamics must serve the people and not serving the interests of the bourgeoisie, as happened in the past or in the service of a fine as outlined bureaucratic elite now On the contrary, should be a redistribution of national wealth in terms of the welfare of large popular majority, after all, should be a facilitator of social and political development of the Venezuelan people.
Of course we know that against an enemy so powerful as U.S. imperialism and the entire international network is structured to ensure the interests of big capital, it becomes necessary to the existence of a strong state, in certain areas, such as defense and national security and strategic level economic. That is, should know and be able to combine the existence of a strong state in certain areas with an organized, strong, widespread in all the interstices of society and added, also, of course, the tasks of defending national sovereignty , the current regional and global geopolitical themselves dictate. In our view, one must be innovative in this area maintain a balance, naturally contradictory, which makes possible the preservation of national sovereignty with a constant effort of integration and solidarity with the brotherly peoples of America and the world and at the same time, simultaneously, be laying the foundation of socialist society.
If communications policy but ...
in ideological matters - communication we wish to emphasize that as a movement linked to the popular media, have always maintained that the Bolivarian revolution if it has and always has had a communications policy which present general guidelines are contained in the Plan Simón Bolívar National and has claimed its achievements over 11 years of Bolivarian process; the many successes achieved in this intense election political journey has on communication support work not hesitate to call fundamental. And in this we must recognize, first, without any hint of flattery, the starring role of Commander Chavez himself has been revealed in a distinguished communicator, who has managed to establish, on their own initiative, an emotional bond with the vast majority of our people through a particular code of your harvest with which he has deciphered the popular concerns and expectations and maintained a close relation to these areas.
Now, though, in the communications field maintain some firmness, as Chávez communicator, which would que agregar el avance que se ha tenido con el fortalecimiento del Sistema Nacional Público de Medios Oficiales (VTV, Radio Nacional, Vive Tv, YVKE Mundial, Correo del Orinoco, TeleSur, Radio Sur, etc.) y, asimismo, con la expansión y proliferación de Medios de Comunicación Popular, Alternativa y Comunitaria a lo largo y ancho del país, hecho este último sin parangón en el mundo entero; no por ello hay que desconocer las fallas y debilidades que se vienen arrastrando en el frente comunicacional, donde, por otra parte, los adversarios externos e internos del proceso revolucionario cuentan, si acaso, con sus mayores fortalezas, que de no tenerlas, sin ninguna duda, las derrotas infringidas a la derecha, sencillamente, had been overwhelming, but the reality is that the opposing forces of the revolution if they have a powerful media apparatus equipped with a high technological capacity in a professional capacity accumulated in decades of experience and investment and so-called "tanks thought "or psychological warfare laboratories coordinated by the imperial center display a daily activity, systematic and relentless to destabilize and disrupt the Bolivarian management and encourage the national and international public opinion the expectation of the removal or truncation of the revolutionary process and / or future (2012) electoral defeat.
As in any transition and for a long period, what is at stake is the bid for hegemony in society, a struggle that is expressed in the battle of ideas and where the media apparatus, precisely because social intermediation role occupies a prime position . We believe that, objectively, in this field with all our strength and progress and we are at a disadvantage, force us to adverse media coverage is higher, counting, addition, to his credit with the cultural industry, private educational institutions, the church hierarchy, traditional family values, etc, which are combined for the production and constant reproduction of the ideology supporting capitalist domination.
Bid for hegemony or battle of ideas
Despite intensive efforts in all spheres of national life still persists in Venezuelan society, capitalist cultural hegemony, being evidence of this, among other events - and must say even if we cook the spirit to express "the teeming corruption present in the pervading social development, of course, the state civil service, with the honorable and dignified exceptions, because the profit motive, the easy profits at the expense of whatever, apparential life values \u200b\u200bare still prevalent in this transitional society.
Hence, in the ideological struggle - communication to be staged in Venezuela is imposed simultaneously address the defense of the revolutionary process that guarantees the large majority the progressive improvement of their living conditions, with the projection of the structural changes that have been operating in the country's socio-economic and promotion of new values \u200b\u200bthat correspond to the new city (a) required for the realization of the new society. Model
bourgeois communication difficult and complex task that necessarily requires review some of the commands and features that until now come to govern the implementation of the communication management of the revolutionary government. First, it is as regards the current communication model that makes the actions of the official media, particularly the television (VTV), very little is different from the present conception in the private media, the technical and academic priority over politics, emphasizing the vedettes and emphasize the characterization of people as a mere recipient of the message (the Bolivarian people as active, critical and participatory in the early years of the Bolivarian process and the years immediately following the coup of April 2002, the business stops from 2002 to 2003 guarimbas and 2004, has again been made invisible state television), towering, in contrast, the technician specialist, dedicated political leader and star interviewer, leaving one hand, practically, the balance must be maintained in this regard.
Second but not least, highlights the failure information relevant to the focus on governance, the commander himself Chavez has been extremely repetitive at this point: the pronounced absence or, in any case, the incomplete information about government's work, of course, the treatment of private media is determined to ignore or misrepresent, the lack of coordination is still apparent in the different levels of state administration at the time of reporting achievement or activity.
Thirdly, there is a marked tendency in official information campaign to keep the saga of the initiative leading opposition is generally on the defensive, responding to the private media, ie, assuming somehow the bourgeois agenda as to be owned by private media groups imbued with bourgeois opposition strategy, the result is that the daily official information policy is marked by the bourgeois opposition.
Fourthly, it is becoming increasingly evident that the means uncritical of the governmental officials at all levels, lack of criticism that far from contributing to the strengthening and effectiveness of the revolutionary government incident, rather, the loss of perspective and gradually slack or dissolving their bases of support. Historical experience stresses that criticism and self criticism are essential tools for the development and rise of revolutionary processes. The absence of people in the mainstream media is one factor that determines the non-questioning and the lack of control of the Bolivarian government as necessary for improvement and deepening of social action that communication should orientar.Modelo Bolivarian
In MoMac we know that every revolutionary process contains and generates its own, their specific communication model, in the process Russian, for example, communication Leninist model, revolving around the term paper, the only possible in this historical context, rested on an idea - strength is summarized in the slogan: Educate - Shake - Organize. In our case, the Bolivarian communication model has been swirling around all expressions now possible communication (print, radio, television, digital) based on the idea - strength of the active and leading role of people both in the fight social in general and in particular the communications tasks.
Our people are heavily involved in the communication activity in order to safeguard and defend the government and the political project Bolivarian threatened and stalked by private means, or rather, by private media companies constituted the spearhead of opposition forces and imperialist plans to replace opposition political parties that had literally disappeared from the political scene. However, that role and popular participatory spirit, reflecting the Bolivarian people as active agent or subject of communication has been increasingly condemned once again to the invisibility and the status of mere passive recipients of communication events in the country. The Bolivarian communication model with its asymmetric nature, with its cargo has been revolutionary and subversive been upsetting a mere reflection of the traditional communication model bourgeois due mainly to the narrow-mindedness with his praise technocratic and loss of strategic perspective of those who have been responsible in recent years, making decisions in the area Bolivarian government and party communications.
budding social movement
popular communication, alternative and community in Venezuela assumed as a dialogic, multi, for his massive and extension throughout the country has become a social phenomenon, and at the same time, one of the signs most characteristic of the new communication model emerged from the very bowels of the Bolivarian revolutionary process. And besides, picking up a sentiment that is rooted almost universally in the social group as the fact of the need to promote the democratization of communication, intervening element to the national effort for social democratization, ie, the socialization of Venezuelan society, popular communicators, today, form a budding social movement whose formalization requires only acquire a program that expresses the demands and expectations of the militant group of popular communication, program, somehow, this reflected in documents and workshops undertaken in recent years control. New
insurgent social movement to meet with other social movements, with the long history of (workers, peasants, students, etc), as well as the emerging (environmental, gender, sex, indigenous, popular economy workers , etc.) should lead to the confluence, a common core of an organized people from their bases in a dialectical relationship, ie, integrated and at the same time contradictory together or next to the revolutionary parties of the militia Bolivarian popular Bolivarian Armed Force and the leadership of Commander Chavez will allow the consolidation of the revolutionary project, defeat imperialism and the counterrevolution and progress towards the construction of socialism in the XXI century
Obviously popular alternative communication and community in our country, has a long and complex road ahead, as well formalized as a social movement, should prepare themselves for continue to fight imperialism and its local lackeys, in our view, is the task or main struggle, but at the same time, should be available to report faults and deviations from those with functions of government and partisan command to invalidate practices the revolutionary character of the Bolivarian process and to confront, of course, those sectors from their positions in schools Address obstruct or impede the development of alternative communication. Communication
Bureaucracy undermines popular communication
In the field of the Bolivarian forces, excluding, of course, the fifth column whose function is to block overlapping, at all levels, progress in the process of revolutionary change, power different sectors that underpin approaches found in relation to the most diverse topics of national life, dialectic, moreover, necessary in any social dynamics. But in the communications field, where different approaches are also discussed concerning the design and implementation of the strategy to be be developed to take the fight media raised in relation to the popular alternative and community media remain biased positions, up stony and poor, often coated with a manipulative and opportunistic rhetoric, designed to contain and impede the development of alternative communication. It is understandable that from the enemy camp, from the sectors that postulate the traditional communication with inspiration and guidance bourgeois and pro-imperialist neoliberal attack and denigrate disqualify alternative communication but it is extremely regrettable that the attacks come from our own field. As confusing and questionable
position we explain them in the analysis made for them, based on two considerations: 1) take communication made as a function or activity to be exercised only by those who have had the opportunity to access vocational training college is to respond to a reductionist and formal, academic, the make the learning process and, therefore, worship the systematic knowledge that the bourgeoisie as the ruling class to consolidate itself, historically, it expropriated the society as a whole, 2) but this academic vision, the communication level, means again that in a conceptual deficiency in a blatant political weakness, of itself, extremely worrying because it shows a profound misunderstanding revolutionary content expresses the participation and involvement of people in the Bolivarian process, in this case, the construction of discourse and communicative action.
The people to understand, better than anyone, that was his Bolivarian Revolution, prepared to defend, develop and deepen it, assuming the communication that is, if anything, the side which has been under siege by the most implacable their enemies were and began to proliferate MAC (now we're a few thousand) as a popular initiative to confront the imperial lackey media onslaught, unleashing a social phenomenon that is unmatched in the communications experience global, breaking paradigms and establishing a trend that continues to flow. The people leading and internalizing the participatory spirit of the Bolivarian process did speak, see, read and heard, using it and straining every possible resource at your fingertips (from the most sophisticated and artisanal), which obviously will beyond the important support provided by the Venezuelan government in its defense policy before the Imperial onslaught.
This burst communication, sociological and historical, based on the libertarian and egalitarian zeal of our people, is what cost him assimilate those who have been responsible for direct public policy communications, rather than promote, encourage, strengthen and using their massive national and EU muscles, on the contrary have tried, in one way or another, limit or coerce and to contain the intrinsic charge subversive and revolutionary audacity which connotes the popular media, alternative and community. Of course, such behavior is not precisely what is assumed to interpret the media practice of Commander Chavez, the most conspicuous expression of thousands of alternative communicators who rise up in this stage of national history. Go bureaucrats government communication area to impose or ask the Chávez communicator requirements, bevels or restrictions as those who have been subjected activators popular communication!, obviously we are not Chavez as the inauguration and historical responsibility that surrounds it, but if you are or intend to be on the engagement as assume the provision and communication militant practice in the defense and deepening of the revolutionary process venezolano.Entre most obvious symptoms of misunderstanding of the state bureaucracy in the communication area in relation to the MAC emphasizes the proposal to call up the National Public Alternative Communication and Community (SNPCAC) political and organizational response the need to organize this important sector of the popular movement. This proposal clearly states the alleged intention of it being the rule, ie the version bureaucratized, who promote and consolidate popular communication organization, intent that basically reflects the hackneyed idea that the people, eternal child, is unfit to drive and develop this type of initiative, requiring, therefore, mentoring of the state, big brother, have difficulty understanding the role of facilitator, rather, it is up to it, at this stage of transition, construction of the revolutionary subject which, popular communicators, we are part, to the extent that an active part of unredeemed people, develop, consciously communicative action alternative, anti-imperialist and socialist. The trend is to replace deprives the people and their leading role by the action imbued with "good intentions" of the bureaucracy communication, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, as the sages say believers. Unfortunately some groups
popular communicators either by the reformist vision that characterizes the position or opportunity that comes to serve as provided in this nefarious proposal comparsa bureaucratic. It is clear that we must promote and accelerate the organization the MAC in a national structure that is capable of enhancing the alternative media response but in no case on the basis of state-sponsorship, it would be so absurd and negative and that the Ministry of Popular Power for Work aims to promote the organization workers as was attempted during the Perez Jimenez dictatorship or as unacceptable as if from INMERCA the promotion of the social organization of the insurgent movement of workers in the economy of Caracas. The organization of the people must be the work of the people themselves, any official interference in this regard must be rejected and assume, rather, as an initiative to counter biased and anti-socialist.
Also, be faced with very forcefully and accurately the height problem of sustainability of the MAC that has inexplicably become one of the weaknesses and challenges that most threaten the development of popular communication. While the right resolved openly and fuss of any kind of sustainable livelihoods that are affected and are fundamental to the development of policies and plans opponents, destabilization and coup; be demonstrative of this, on the one hand, the financial support they receive externally of NGOs and Foundations ("USAID", "NED", "Konrad Adenauer", "FULBRIGHT", etc.) that serve device and platform to the imperialist strategy, a mechanism through which decanted million dollars and euros to cover and keep the media structure that also includes the so-called thin or think tanks tanks or laboratories for psychological warfare and dirty war that constantly develop against Venezuela, and, moreover, the claims available to the companies or transnational networks established in the country and the large private oligopolies and big business to hire advertising in private media, thus holding all opposition media structure is present throughout the national territory, having the added source of funding which means the spaces of state power that the opposition controls the level of governors and mayors, this occurs in a notary public and political solidarity expressing the bourgeoisie and the opposition have with their national media, regional and local along around the country, the bourgeoisie aware of what is at stake calls or make more active use of their class solidarity.
In contrast, there was the little or no provision for those able to make decisions in official communication structure, officials, of course, fifteen and finally to have secured their personal and family support as employees who are rentier state, and have the responsibility to develop and manage the budget appropriations, but nevertheless, despite the rhetoric of opportunity, in practice, in fact, that's what really counts are reluctant to provide financial support for communication popular resist the state apparatus to exercise the appropriate role to facilitate, sponsor and promote the MAC as part of the genuine popular movement, destined to play a strategic role in counter-hegemonic struggle and resistance to the enemies of Venezuelan Revolution. Certainly
in the fabric of State - Government officials are likely to encourage popular support for communication, but unfortunately are exceptions, what is clear is that while Chávez own commander as head of state and head of government has advocated support for the MAC, speaking publicly, and in many cases the strategic importance and desirability of technology should be assisted financially and logistically, the fact is that such guidance to the commander of the revolution have been evaporated, neglected and broken in the thick fog and counter the heavy state bureaucracy. Several
are the arguments that have been put forward and peaked at the time to explain and justify the unjustifiable, since budgetary constraints to the commercial reasoning own more staunch neoliberalism, such as the small audience and limited readers who reach the MAC, the limited impact and low movement thereof and to the relative quality of its presentation and format, that is, as what matters according to these officials argue such reasoning is the marketing of "their" institutions, that the message of its "institutions" reaches the public, therefore there is no room for advertising on the popular means of communication, therefore it favors the insertion of notices in media private advertising agencies marketing if you know that they ensure that the "product" will reach the receiver general public, and which, incidentally, are also experts on the usual commissions, bribes or "kickbacks" that emerge, usually after every trade.
Also, in this sense, it is unfortunate the actions of a certain cohort of alternative and community media to be provided communication management bureaucracy, wield the strange thesis that since the capitalist nature of the advertising is necessary to develop other instruments or figures to channel state support for the MAC, and to that effect, have raised the kind of mechanism to be used should be the presentation of annual outreach projects, which being undertaken by government agencies, would ensure the aid or funding concerned. Obviate these developed in certain groups who simply approval of such projects is covered with a long and cumbersome, unwieldy bureaucracy itself unable to make and implement practical decisions in the short term, while the MAC is in its death throes and despair, living with the anguish of being unable to fulfill its fundamental task is to develop as a counter-communication practices as required in this transition Venezuela ... Ah, but the above and enlightened spokesmen of the groups driving the "new" concept of projects under the relationship they have managed to cultivate bureaucratic sectors down state conventions and contracts (legal figures, of course, that could not be more capitalist) with certain institutions to deliver workshops, painting murals, printing books by way of subcontracts, etc.. and obviously, it is difficult to conceive more incongruity and inconsistency practiced by those on community. Law
popular communication.
Another important aspect that requires the attention of popular communicators throughout the country is with respect to legal instrument to collect social reality expressing the insurgency and increasingly conspicuous presence of popular and alternative media in Venezuela in the first half of this century.
In general, contemporary communication needs of a new legal architecture that is in tune with both the technological advances in communication and information with the new parameters in the social and cultural development has been present in the national reality. And yet, this legal requirement is necessary for a sector such as the popular media, become a social phenomenon, it makes working life in the broadest and most remote areas of Venezuelan society. Out a great national movement to promote and then pass the Law of the popular media is one of the most important tasks and flags that we should encourage the popular Venezuelan journalists in the immediate days ahead. Communication
push ahead with the Mission's war communications
From MoMac have postulated the proposal of the Mission Communication as brave Venezuelan people's response to the aggressive and intense media campaign both internally and externally have unleashed the enemies of the Venezuelan nation, imperialism American first, and local private business groups with their troupes economic, political, ecclesiastical and squalid of all stripes, secondly, by submitting to a media war, virtually since the establishment of the Bolivarian government by free and sovereign decision own people. Media war in which appeal to all its resources to bombard the psyche of the Venezuelan capitalist values \u200b\u200band messages distorted, creating a virtual reality marked by chaos and uncertainty, trying to further isolate us as a country surrounded and internationally, all in keeping with the strategy of trying to preserve their monopoly interests in the national economy and particularly to maintain control of large hydrocarbon resources with which our country and the Venezuelan government has been serving the nation and the Venezuelan people. The history of imperialism in Latin America and the Caribbean, points out its commitment to truncate all Nuestroamericanos roots effort to carve out a dignified and independent way, in the case of Venezuela Bolivarian twenty-first century imperial onslaught and their lackeys have been bound by placing the accent on a recalcitrant media destabilizing action.
Thus, as the Bolivarian government in line with the historical necessity of satisfying the demands of our people passed over in education, health, economic, cultural, social exclusion weaker sectors, housing, food and environmental problems. conceived, designed and promoted the social missions within the purpose of advancing and immediate satisfactory answers to popular aspirations, and for such purposes obviated heavy structure, ossified, bureaucratic legacy of the bourgeois state, undertaking the mission with which satellite has achieved highly significant, to such an extent, that has allowed our country to overcome in relatively short time, the Millennium goals set by the United Nations 2015 and what is more important to begin to raise the standard of living of the majority popular extolling therefore, self-esteem of Venezuelans. From this perspective, on communication, is that we have considered that being the side on which the enemies of the Bolivarian revolution have put their best efforts, it therefore requires a strong response can to sensitize and mobilize all the people in this struggle for dignity, sovereignty, independence of the country and building socialism, this response, we believe, can not be other people's war communications. War
popular communication in which all sectors patriotic and socialist Bolivarian have a significant role to play, from social movements, the revolutionary parties, communes, workers' councils, student council, rural councils, social missions, alternative and community media, the Bolivarian militia, etc. All sectors of the town organized the contest, of course, the media should be mobilized to take action on such a scale, coordinated communication in the Mission, from this perspective would be developing a communicative action with international repercussions unparalleled in human history that has simultaneously contribute to the humanization and socialization of society general. In Bolivarian Venezuela think and take the communication as a tool for liberation, for the construction of a counter-vision is understanding communication as a pathway for alternativity to capitalist domination and imperial subjugation.
the importance of developing a mission, the Mission Communication, which we conceive communication and popular war, namely the inclusion of all people in the communications tasks, recruit and motivate all the resources and potentials available from the most elementary and craft to the most sophisticated and advanced, apart from the trend or structure bureaucratic communication and appealing to the creative powers of people, expanding and spreading its expressive capacity, multiplied by hundreds of thousands of existing popular media and alternative, assuming the communication as a dialogic and multi-directional and multi-building since the MAC cores counter-ideological resistance and repel able to decode the message imperialist, neo-liberal, bourgeois and impellers, in contrast, a liberating and inspiring message of the new country, the socialist motherland. Build what we call a country Communicators. PRACTICE bureaucratic hinders the development of the Bolivarian Revolution!
COMMUNICATIONAL BOLIVARIANO consolidate the model!
COMMUNICATIONAL PEOPLE'S WAR IS THE ANSWER TO THE IMPERIAL media war
COMMUNICATORS BUILD A COUNTRY!
MOVEMENT OF ALTERNATIVE SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY (CENTRAL COUNCIL MoMac
)------------------ Carlos Machado Humberto Miguel Ugas Gómez García Luis Salazar
Martin Maytín Linero José López Jaime Guillermo Fleitas
Nancy Bracho Freddy Alberto Garrido Nicolas Rolland Raymond Certain
Fidel Javier Santander Luis Borges
Justin Franklin Roa Federico González Urbina Carlos Rodriguez Rafael Godoy
Av Urdaneta, Edif Protex, Floor 11, Ofic 115, Caracas Tel: 02125648163 / 04142786932 / 04169162282/04168198173Email: mov.soc.mac @ gmail.com; miguelugas
Introduction.
In Central Council meeting Social Movement Alternative and Community Media (MoMac) in the populous, diverse and combative Catia community, parish Sucre, Caracas, Saturday, October 16, 2010, under the starting year of the bicentenary cycle that marks the independence struggle that made possible the liberation of the homeland from the yoke of English imperialism and served at the same time, an example and stimulus for the release of the sister nuestroamericanos, and in the midst of the current struggle that has raised the brave Bolivarian people by the final consolidation of the independence of all kinds of imperialist intervention and the realization of the dream of our founding fathers Bolivarian reflected in the expression to achieve "... the greatest sum of happiness possible" and in response also to us as men and women workers (as) inseparable from the popular media, on the one hand, with the complaint and confrontation of the imperialist hegemonic message - neoliberal and on the other, generating a new model of social change communication facilitator; of citizens (as) aware of the need to establish new and higher social relations, and revolutionaries (as) committed (as) with the revolutionary struggle vindicating of all the aspirations and hopes of our people, was approved this document in synthetic terms, reflects the approach we hold the present political situation and the relationship between State and Communication and the name of Manifest Catia make known to the public as a necessary and indispensable contribution to the debate between the revolutionary (as) Venezuela (as).
As 26S elections and their results.
note that: 1. regarding the composition of the new National Assembly, the Bolivarian forces won a comfortable majority (98/67) that will maintain a decisive influence in the national parliament, an institution designed to serve a very important role in the political dynamics of the future, even where not achieved the desired qualified majority required for making decisions on certain matters of institutional importance and, for its part, the opposition forces had recovered a lost space in the previous elections when, by his calculations destabilizing coup and took the stupid decision to abstain 2. in relation to the sum of the votes, although it is rude to extrapolate to regard it as a projection defining the future political scenario, whether it is useful as an indicator to approximate the existing balance of power (just over five million votes for each force polarized). And it is reflected stagnant revolutionary option for wear government action, as opposed to a relative growth of the forces propelling the former conservative or status quo, denoting by masonry, the penetration of regressive ideas in certain areas of the popular sectors. Here are the results as compelling reading becomes critical for contextual analysis: in any case, it looks appropriate to determine the possible causes that affect the stagnation of the transforming forces.
In our view this should be the main concern of the Venezuelan revolutionaries, at the present time, but shall not be conceptualized as imminent danger to the process of change which is playing in the Venezuelan social reality (among other things because in this election was not raised competition commander candidatural Chavez fundamental political factor motivational collective sense in the first half of XXI century Venezuelan). Servants
cuartorrepublicano
Undoubtedly, a number of factors combine to produce these results, among others, we appreciate the impact on the popular electorate of poor management of mayors and governors - with the natural exceptions - in different regions of the country that been generating a growing unease and disappointment evident in a town hungry for solutions to their problems and realizing their dreams, with the aggravating circumstance of the absence of a party capable capable of exercising critical function necessary comptroller. In this vote punishment and / or indifference abstention, it is felt the wicked and indolent bureaucracy fueled by the fifth column, all levels of government, makes decisions, monitoring of effective executory provisions and guidelines involving to welcome the millions of concurrent users to public offices.
In this consideration it is true we miss the fact that the vast majority of technical staff on which rest the functioning of the Venezuelan state apparatus were formed during the fourth republic prevail, yet, in them the values \u200b\u200bof capitalist society , rentier, consumerist and dependent precisely is to be transformed. It is in this civil service that has been the rule, with its many flaws and virtues rare, so it will go while building a new hegemony and training, therefore, the new city, including new staff, with the values \u200b\u200binherent in society of the future.
This confrontation can not be but an expression of intense and necessary class struggle is the ideological core of its edges.
The revolution is made against the State
In this vein, too, it should be mentioned the incongruity theory - conceptual show government officials, senior and middle leaders of the party (PSUV) in the sense of taking the state as the decisive instrument for the construction of socialism, according to this approach is not the revolution against the state, but with and from the state, placing a neutral entity and served for the construction of bourgeois society can serve, given its neutrality, to build a socialist society, gross ignorance has cost both to other people who have experienced the same error.
From our point of view, this conceptual failure in practical terms translates into the effort that put officials on strengthening their "areas of power" or promote a course tutored people power from and by the State at the expense of genuine development of popular power, strengthening of social movements, blocking, therefore the organization of people, historical subject of the Bolivarian revolution. Do not understand that the State, rather, we must weaken progressively strengthened, in contrast, people's organization through the municipalities, community councils, councils of workers, peasants and students and so many other expressions of popular organization, in this The National Assembly now dies, fulfilled an important task to give legal content to an entire social reality that has been manifest in this decade of the Bolivarian process, even if, in our opinion, committed significant shortcomings such as non-approval of the Labor Law.
In this historic period of transition, the State inherited subjected to continuous processing dynamics must serve the people and not serving the interests of the bourgeoisie, as happened in the past or in the service of a fine as outlined bureaucratic elite now On the contrary, should be a redistribution of national wealth in terms of the welfare of large popular majority, after all, should be a facilitator of social and political development of the Venezuelan people.
Of course we know that against an enemy so powerful as U.S. imperialism and the entire international network is structured to ensure the interests of big capital, it becomes necessary to the existence of a strong state, in certain areas, such as defense and national security and strategic level economic. That is, should know and be able to combine the existence of a strong state in certain areas with an organized, strong, widespread in all the interstices of society and added, also, of course, the tasks of defending national sovereignty , the current regional and global geopolitical themselves dictate. In our view, one must be innovative in this area maintain a balance, naturally contradictory, which makes possible the preservation of national sovereignty with a constant effort of integration and solidarity with the brotherly peoples of America and the world and at the same time, simultaneously, be laying the foundation of socialist society.
If communications policy but ...
in ideological matters - communication we wish to emphasize that as a movement linked to the popular media, have always maintained that the Bolivarian revolution if it has and always has had a communications policy which present general guidelines are contained in the Plan Simón Bolívar National and has claimed its achievements over 11 years of Bolivarian process; the many successes achieved in this intense election political journey has on communication support work not hesitate to call fundamental. And in this we must recognize, first, without any hint of flattery, the starring role of Commander Chavez himself has been revealed in a distinguished communicator, who has managed to establish, on their own initiative, an emotional bond with the vast majority of our people through a particular code of your harvest with which he has deciphered the popular concerns and expectations and maintained a close relation to these areas.
Now, though, in the communications field maintain some firmness, as Chávez communicator, which would que agregar el avance que se ha tenido con el fortalecimiento del Sistema Nacional Público de Medios Oficiales (VTV, Radio Nacional, Vive Tv, YVKE Mundial, Correo del Orinoco, TeleSur, Radio Sur, etc.) y, asimismo, con la expansión y proliferación de Medios de Comunicación Popular, Alternativa y Comunitaria a lo largo y ancho del país, hecho este último sin parangón en el mundo entero; no por ello hay que desconocer las fallas y debilidades que se vienen arrastrando en el frente comunicacional, donde, por otra parte, los adversarios externos e internos del proceso revolucionario cuentan, si acaso, con sus mayores fortalezas, que de no tenerlas, sin ninguna duda, las derrotas infringidas a la derecha, sencillamente, had been overwhelming, but the reality is that the opposing forces of the revolution if they have a powerful media apparatus equipped with a high technological capacity in a professional capacity accumulated in decades of experience and investment and so-called "tanks thought "or psychological warfare laboratories coordinated by the imperial center display a daily activity, systematic and relentless to destabilize and disrupt the Bolivarian management and encourage the national and international public opinion the expectation of the removal or truncation of the revolutionary process and / or future (2012) electoral defeat.
As in any transition and for a long period, what is at stake is the bid for hegemony in society, a struggle that is expressed in the battle of ideas and where the media apparatus, precisely because social intermediation role occupies a prime position . We believe that, objectively, in this field with all our strength and progress and we are at a disadvantage, force us to adverse media coverage is higher, counting, addition, to his credit with the cultural industry, private educational institutions, the church hierarchy, traditional family values, etc, which are combined for the production and constant reproduction of the ideology supporting capitalist domination.
Bid for hegemony or battle of ideas
Despite intensive efforts in all spheres of national life still persists in Venezuelan society, capitalist cultural hegemony, being evidence of this, among other events - and must say even if we cook the spirit to express "the teeming corruption present in the pervading social development, of course, the state civil service, with the honorable and dignified exceptions, because the profit motive, the easy profits at the expense of whatever, apparential life values \u200b\u200bare still prevalent in this transitional society.
Hence, in the ideological struggle - communication to be staged in Venezuela is imposed simultaneously address the defense of the revolutionary process that guarantees the large majority the progressive improvement of their living conditions, with the projection of the structural changes that have been operating in the country's socio-economic and promotion of new values \u200b\u200bthat correspond to the new city (a) required for the realization of the new society. Model
bourgeois communication difficult and complex task that necessarily requires review some of the commands and features that until now come to govern the implementation of the communication management of the revolutionary government. First, it is as regards the current communication model that makes the actions of the official media, particularly the television (VTV), very little is different from the present conception in the private media, the technical and academic priority over politics, emphasizing the vedettes and emphasize the characterization of people as a mere recipient of the message (the Bolivarian people as active, critical and participatory in the early years of the Bolivarian process and the years immediately following the coup of April 2002, the business stops from 2002 to 2003 guarimbas and 2004, has again been made invisible state television), towering, in contrast, the technician specialist, dedicated political leader and star interviewer, leaving one hand, practically, the balance must be maintained in this regard.
Second but not least, highlights the failure information relevant to the focus on governance, the commander himself Chavez has been extremely repetitive at this point: the pronounced absence or, in any case, the incomplete information about government's work, of course, the treatment of private media is determined to ignore or misrepresent, the lack of coordination is still apparent in the different levels of state administration at the time of reporting achievement or activity.
Thirdly, there is a marked tendency in official information campaign to keep the saga of the initiative leading opposition is generally on the defensive, responding to the private media, ie, assuming somehow the bourgeois agenda as to be owned by private media groups imbued with bourgeois opposition strategy, the result is that the daily official information policy is marked by the bourgeois opposition.
Fourthly, it is becoming increasingly evident that the means uncritical of the governmental officials at all levels, lack of criticism that far from contributing to the strengthening and effectiveness of the revolutionary government incident, rather, the loss of perspective and gradually slack or dissolving their bases of support. Historical experience stresses that criticism and self criticism are essential tools for the development and rise of revolutionary processes. The absence of people in the mainstream media is one factor that determines the non-questioning and the lack of control of the Bolivarian government as necessary for improvement and deepening of social action that communication should orientar.Modelo Bolivarian
In MoMac we know that every revolutionary process contains and generates its own, their specific communication model, in the process Russian, for example, communication Leninist model, revolving around the term paper, the only possible in this historical context, rested on an idea - strength is summarized in the slogan: Educate - Shake - Organize. In our case, the Bolivarian communication model has been swirling around all expressions now possible communication (print, radio, television, digital) based on the idea - strength of the active and leading role of people both in the fight social in general and in particular the communications tasks.
Our people are heavily involved in the communication activity in order to safeguard and defend the government and the political project Bolivarian threatened and stalked by private means, or rather, by private media companies constituted the spearhead of opposition forces and imperialist plans to replace opposition political parties that had literally disappeared from the political scene. However, that role and popular participatory spirit, reflecting the Bolivarian people as active agent or subject of communication has been increasingly condemned once again to the invisibility and the status of mere passive recipients of communication events in the country. The Bolivarian communication model with its asymmetric nature, with its cargo has been revolutionary and subversive been upsetting a mere reflection of the traditional communication model bourgeois due mainly to the narrow-mindedness with his praise technocratic and loss of strategic perspective of those who have been responsible in recent years, making decisions in the area Bolivarian government and party communications.
budding social movement
popular communication, alternative and community in Venezuela assumed as a dialogic, multi, for his massive and extension throughout the country has become a social phenomenon, and at the same time, one of the signs most characteristic of the new communication model emerged from the very bowels of the Bolivarian revolutionary process. And besides, picking up a sentiment that is rooted almost universally in the social group as the fact of the need to promote the democratization of communication, intervening element to the national effort for social democratization, ie, the socialization of Venezuelan society, popular communicators, today, form a budding social movement whose formalization requires only acquire a program that expresses the demands and expectations of the militant group of popular communication, program, somehow, this reflected in documents and workshops undertaken in recent years control. New
insurgent social movement to meet with other social movements, with the long history of (workers, peasants, students, etc), as well as the emerging (environmental, gender, sex, indigenous, popular economy workers , etc.) should lead to the confluence, a common core of an organized people from their bases in a dialectical relationship, ie, integrated and at the same time contradictory together or next to the revolutionary parties of the militia Bolivarian popular Bolivarian Armed Force and the leadership of Commander Chavez will allow the consolidation of the revolutionary project, defeat imperialism and the counterrevolution and progress towards the construction of socialism in the XXI century
Obviously popular alternative communication and community in our country, has a long and complex road ahead, as well formalized as a social movement, should prepare themselves for continue to fight imperialism and its local lackeys, in our view, is the task or main struggle, but at the same time, should be available to report faults and deviations from those with functions of government and partisan command to invalidate practices the revolutionary character of the Bolivarian process and to confront, of course, those sectors from their positions in schools Address obstruct or impede the development of alternative communication. Communication
Bureaucracy undermines popular communication
In the field of the Bolivarian forces, excluding, of course, the fifth column whose function is to block overlapping, at all levels, progress in the process of revolutionary change, power different sectors that underpin approaches found in relation to the most diverse topics of national life, dialectic, moreover, necessary in any social dynamics. But in the communications field, where different approaches are also discussed concerning the design and implementation of the strategy to be be developed to take the fight media raised in relation to the popular alternative and community media remain biased positions, up stony and poor, often coated with a manipulative and opportunistic rhetoric, designed to contain and impede the development of alternative communication. It is understandable that from the enemy camp, from the sectors that postulate the traditional communication with inspiration and guidance bourgeois and pro-imperialist neoliberal attack and denigrate disqualify alternative communication but it is extremely regrettable that the attacks come from our own field. As confusing and questionable
position we explain them in the analysis made for them, based on two considerations: 1) take communication made as a function or activity to be exercised only by those who have had the opportunity to access vocational training college is to respond to a reductionist and formal, academic, the make the learning process and, therefore, worship the systematic knowledge that the bourgeoisie as the ruling class to consolidate itself, historically, it expropriated the society as a whole, 2) but this academic vision, the communication level, means again that in a conceptual deficiency in a blatant political weakness, of itself, extremely worrying because it shows a profound misunderstanding revolutionary content expresses the participation and involvement of people in the Bolivarian process, in this case, the construction of discourse and communicative action.
The people to understand, better than anyone, that was his Bolivarian Revolution, prepared to defend, develop and deepen it, assuming the communication that is, if anything, the side which has been under siege by the most implacable their enemies were and began to proliferate MAC (now we're a few thousand) as a popular initiative to confront the imperial lackey media onslaught, unleashing a social phenomenon that is unmatched in the communications experience global, breaking paradigms and establishing a trend that continues to flow. The people leading and internalizing the participatory spirit of the Bolivarian process did speak, see, read and heard, using it and straining every possible resource at your fingertips (from the most sophisticated and artisanal), which obviously will beyond the important support provided by the Venezuelan government in its defense policy before the Imperial onslaught.
This burst communication, sociological and historical, based on the libertarian and egalitarian zeal of our people, is what cost him assimilate those who have been responsible for direct public policy communications, rather than promote, encourage, strengthen and using their massive national and EU muscles, on the contrary have tried, in one way or another, limit or coerce and to contain the intrinsic charge subversive and revolutionary audacity which connotes the popular media, alternative and community. Of course, such behavior is not precisely what is assumed to interpret the media practice of Commander Chavez, the most conspicuous expression of thousands of alternative communicators who rise up in this stage of national history. Go bureaucrats government communication area to impose or ask the Chávez communicator requirements, bevels or restrictions as those who have been subjected activators popular communication!, obviously we are not Chavez as the inauguration and historical responsibility that surrounds it, but if you are or intend to be on the engagement as assume the provision and communication militant practice in the defense and deepening of the revolutionary process venezolano.Entre most obvious symptoms of misunderstanding of the state bureaucracy in the communication area in relation to the MAC emphasizes the proposal to call up the National Public Alternative Communication and Community (SNPCAC) political and organizational response the need to organize this important sector of the popular movement. This proposal clearly states the alleged intention of it being the rule, ie the version bureaucratized, who promote and consolidate popular communication organization, intent that basically reflects the hackneyed idea that the people, eternal child, is unfit to drive and develop this type of initiative, requiring, therefore, mentoring of the state, big brother, have difficulty understanding the role of facilitator, rather, it is up to it, at this stage of transition, construction of the revolutionary subject which, popular communicators, we are part, to the extent that an active part of unredeemed people, develop, consciously communicative action alternative, anti-imperialist and socialist. The trend is to replace deprives the people and their leading role by the action imbued with "good intentions" of the bureaucracy communication, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, as the sages say believers. Unfortunately some groups
popular communicators either by the reformist vision that characterizes the position or opportunity that comes to serve as provided in this nefarious proposal comparsa bureaucratic. It is clear that we must promote and accelerate the organization the MAC in a national structure that is capable of enhancing the alternative media response but in no case on the basis of state-sponsorship, it would be so absurd and negative and that the Ministry of Popular Power for Work aims to promote the organization workers as was attempted during the Perez Jimenez dictatorship or as unacceptable as if from INMERCA the promotion of the social organization of the insurgent movement of workers in the economy of Caracas. The organization of the people must be the work of the people themselves, any official interference in this regard must be rejected and assume, rather, as an initiative to counter biased and anti-socialist.
Also, be faced with very forcefully and accurately the height problem of sustainability of the MAC that has inexplicably become one of the weaknesses and challenges that most threaten the development of popular communication. While the right resolved openly and fuss of any kind of sustainable livelihoods that are affected and are fundamental to the development of policies and plans opponents, destabilization and coup; be demonstrative of this, on the one hand, the financial support they receive externally of NGOs and Foundations ("USAID", "NED", "Konrad Adenauer", "FULBRIGHT", etc.) that serve device and platform to the imperialist strategy, a mechanism through which decanted million dollars and euros to cover and keep the media structure that also includes the so-called thin or think tanks tanks or laboratories for psychological warfare and dirty war that constantly develop against Venezuela, and, moreover, the claims available to the companies or transnational networks established in the country and the large private oligopolies and big business to hire advertising in private media, thus holding all opposition media structure is present throughout the national territory, having the added source of funding which means the spaces of state power that the opposition controls the level of governors and mayors, this occurs in a notary public and political solidarity expressing the bourgeoisie and the opposition have with their national media, regional and local along around the country, the bourgeoisie aware of what is at stake calls or make more active use of their class solidarity.
In contrast, there was the little or no provision for those able to make decisions in official communication structure, officials, of course, fifteen and finally to have secured their personal and family support as employees who are rentier state, and have the responsibility to develop and manage the budget appropriations, but nevertheless, despite the rhetoric of opportunity, in practice, in fact, that's what really counts are reluctant to provide financial support for communication popular resist the state apparatus to exercise the appropriate role to facilitate, sponsor and promote the MAC as part of the genuine popular movement, destined to play a strategic role in counter-hegemonic struggle and resistance to the enemies of Venezuelan Revolution. Certainly
in the fabric of State - Government officials are likely to encourage popular support for communication, but unfortunately are exceptions, what is clear is that while Chávez own commander as head of state and head of government has advocated support for the MAC, speaking publicly, and in many cases the strategic importance and desirability of technology should be assisted financially and logistically, the fact is that such guidance to the commander of the revolution have been evaporated, neglected and broken in the thick fog and counter the heavy state bureaucracy. Several
are the arguments that have been put forward and peaked at the time to explain and justify the unjustifiable, since budgetary constraints to the commercial reasoning own more staunch neoliberalism, such as the small audience and limited readers who reach the MAC, the limited impact and low movement thereof and to the relative quality of its presentation and format, that is, as what matters according to these officials argue such reasoning is the marketing of "their" institutions, that the message of its "institutions" reaches the public, therefore there is no room for advertising on the popular means of communication, therefore it favors the insertion of notices in media private advertising agencies marketing if you know that they ensure that the "product" will reach the receiver general public, and which, incidentally, are also experts on the usual commissions, bribes or "kickbacks" that emerge, usually after every trade.
Also, in this sense, it is unfortunate the actions of a certain cohort of alternative and community media to be provided communication management bureaucracy, wield the strange thesis that since the capitalist nature of the advertising is necessary to develop other instruments or figures to channel state support for the MAC, and to that effect, have raised the kind of mechanism to be used should be the presentation of annual outreach projects, which being undertaken by government agencies, would ensure the aid or funding concerned. Obviate these developed in certain groups who simply approval of such projects is covered with a long and cumbersome, unwieldy bureaucracy itself unable to make and implement practical decisions in the short term, while the MAC is in its death throes and despair, living with the anguish of being unable to fulfill its fundamental task is to develop as a counter-communication practices as required in this transition Venezuela ... Ah, but the above and enlightened spokesmen of the groups driving the "new" concept of projects under the relationship they have managed to cultivate bureaucratic sectors down state conventions and contracts (legal figures, of course, that could not be more capitalist) with certain institutions to deliver workshops, painting murals, printing books by way of subcontracts, etc.. and obviously, it is difficult to conceive more incongruity and inconsistency practiced by those on community. Law
popular communication.
Another important aspect that requires the attention of popular communicators throughout the country is with respect to legal instrument to collect social reality expressing the insurgency and increasingly conspicuous presence of popular and alternative media in Venezuela in the first half of this century.
In general, contemporary communication needs of a new legal architecture that is in tune with both the technological advances in communication and information with the new parameters in the social and cultural development has been present in the national reality. And yet, this legal requirement is necessary for a sector such as the popular media, become a social phenomenon, it makes working life in the broadest and most remote areas of Venezuelan society. Out a great national movement to promote and then pass the Law of the popular media is one of the most important tasks and flags that we should encourage the popular Venezuelan journalists in the immediate days ahead. Communication
push ahead with the Mission's war communications
From MoMac have postulated the proposal of the Mission Communication as brave Venezuelan people's response to the aggressive and intense media campaign both internally and externally have unleashed the enemies of the Venezuelan nation, imperialism American first, and local private business groups with their troupes economic, political, ecclesiastical and squalid of all stripes, secondly, by submitting to a media war, virtually since the establishment of the Bolivarian government by free and sovereign decision own people. Media war in which appeal to all its resources to bombard the psyche of the Venezuelan capitalist values \u200b\u200band messages distorted, creating a virtual reality marked by chaos and uncertainty, trying to further isolate us as a country surrounded and internationally, all in keeping with the strategy of trying to preserve their monopoly interests in the national economy and particularly to maintain control of large hydrocarbon resources with which our country and the Venezuelan government has been serving the nation and the Venezuelan people. The history of imperialism in Latin America and the Caribbean, points out its commitment to truncate all Nuestroamericanos roots effort to carve out a dignified and independent way, in the case of Venezuela Bolivarian twenty-first century imperial onslaught and their lackeys have been bound by placing the accent on a recalcitrant media destabilizing action.
Thus, as the Bolivarian government in line with the historical necessity of satisfying the demands of our people passed over in education, health, economic, cultural, social exclusion weaker sectors, housing, food and environmental problems. conceived, designed and promoted the social missions within the purpose of advancing and immediate satisfactory answers to popular aspirations, and for such purposes obviated heavy structure, ossified, bureaucratic legacy of the bourgeois state, undertaking the mission with which satellite has achieved highly significant, to such an extent, that has allowed our country to overcome in relatively short time, the Millennium goals set by the United Nations 2015 and what is more important to begin to raise the standard of living of the majority popular extolling therefore, self-esteem of Venezuelans. From this perspective, on communication, is that we have considered that being the side on which the enemies of the Bolivarian revolution have put their best efforts, it therefore requires a strong response can to sensitize and mobilize all the people in this struggle for dignity, sovereignty, independence of the country and building socialism, this response, we believe, can not be other people's war communications. War
popular communication in which all sectors patriotic and socialist Bolivarian have a significant role to play, from social movements, the revolutionary parties, communes, workers' councils, student council, rural councils, social missions, alternative and community media, the Bolivarian militia, etc. All sectors of the town organized the contest, of course, the media should be mobilized to take action on such a scale, coordinated communication in the Mission, from this perspective would be developing a communicative action with international repercussions unparalleled in human history that has simultaneously contribute to the humanization and socialization of society general. In Bolivarian Venezuela think and take the communication as a tool for liberation, for the construction of a counter-vision is understanding communication as a pathway for alternativity to capitalist domination and imperial subjugation.
the importance of developing a mission, the Mission Communication, which we conceive communication and popular war, namely the inclusion of all people in the communications tasks, recruit and motivate all the resources and potentials available from the most elementary and craft to the most sophisticated and advanced, apart from the trend or structure bureaucratic communication and appealing to the creative powers of people, expanding and spreading its expressive capacity, multiplied by hundreds of thousands of existing popular media and alternative, assuming the communication as a dialogic and multi-directional and multi-building since the MAC cores counter-ideological resistance and repel able to decode the message imperialist, neo-liberal, bourgeois and impellers, in contrast, a liberating and inspiring message of the new country, the socialist motherland. Build what we call a country Communicators. PRACTICE bureaucratic hinders the development of the Bolivarian Revolution!
COMMUNICATIONAL BOLIVARIANO consolidate the model!
COMMUNICATIONAL PEOPLE'S WAR IS THE ANSWER TO THE IMPERIAL media war
COMMUNICATORS BUILD A COUNTRY!
MOVEMENT OF ALTERNATIVE SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY (CENTRAL COUNCIL MoMac
)------------------ Carlos Machado Humberto Miguel Ugas Gómez García Luis Salazar
Martin Maytín Linero José López Jaime Guillermo Fleitas
Nancy Bracho Freddy Alberto Garrido Nicolas Rolland Raymond Certain
Fidel Javier Santander Luis Borges
Justin Franklin Roa Federico González Urbina Carlos Rodriguez Rafael Godoy
Av Urdaneta, Edif Protex, Floor 11, Ofic 115, Caracas Tel: 02125648163 / 04142786932 / 04169162282/04168198173Email: mov.soc.mac @ gmail.com; miguelugas
0 comments:
Post a Comment